Lungs, asthma, respiratory condition

(© Marina Zlochin -

SYDNEY, Australia — Animal testing is traditionally the first step when testing drugs and how they might potentially affect humans. However, there are a number of financial and ethical reasons to cut down on the number of animal experiments. One replacement is creating mini-organs to simulate the real thing. Researchers in Australia are looking at a new approach for creating advanced 3D lung structures — all starting in a single petri dish.

According to the authors, lung models could shorten drug development times. Currently, it takes about 10 to 15 years to test a drug before it actually reaches the market.

Scientists created two lab-made lung models from human primary cells. The first one resembles a healthy lung to test the safety of a new drug. The second mimics phase 2 trials, where researchers test new drugs on a diseased lung. In this scenario, the unhealthy lung resembled the ones seen in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

“We take cells directly from patients and then build them in layers as they exist inside the body. So, first you have the epithelial cells, then you have the fibroblasts—we are literally creating a mimic organ that is very much like actual human lungs,” says Wojciech Chrzanowski, a professor of nanomedicine at the University of Sydney and co-author of the study, in a media release.

Diseased lung slice compared to a healthy lung
Diseased (left) and healthy (right) membrane slivers from a lung organoid [Credit: Phan et al.]
The lung models were more accurate than using cell cultures or animal models in terms of simulating what happens when a drug affects someone with COPD.

“With a traditional cell culture, you put cells into a Petri dish and culture them in static conditions, which is far from what happens in a human body. What we are doing is creating environmental conditions similar to those which exist in the human body,” explains lead study author Huyen Phan, a researcher at the University of Sydney.

To maintain similar environmental conditions as a human lung, the researchers kept the air on one side and a liquid interface at the bottom along with microcirculation that would resemble blood circulation.

“These two elements combined help emulate the conditions of a human lung, making them more accurate,” the team explains.

Looking beyond drug testing, the lung models have the potential to help with creating personalized medications for people. For example, if you wanted to test a range of reactions in a lung, you can take a sample of cells from a person and create a lung that most resembles theirs. The mini-organs could also help with testing the danger of air-borne pollutants in areas with high levels of air pollution or forest fires.

“They accelerate the process of discovery, they shorten the process of getting to clinics, but also substantially increase our confidence in the molecules we create before we go to clinical trials,” says Chrzanowski.

The study is published on the preprint server of Biomaterials Research, meaning the findings are still awaiting peer review from other scientists.

You might also be interested in:

About Jocelyn Solis-Moreira

Jocelyn is a New York-based science journalist whose work has appeared in Discover Magazine, Health, and Live Science, among other publications. She holds a Master's of Science in Psychology with a concentration in behavioral neuroscience and a Bachelor's of Science in integrative neuroscience from Binghamton University. Jocelyn has reported on several medical and science topics ranging from coronavirus news to the latest findings in women's health.

Our Editorial Process

StudyFinds publishes digestible, agenda-free, transparent research summaries that are intended to inform the reader as well as stir civil, educated debate. We do not agree nor disagree with any of the studies we post, rather, we encourage our readers to debate the veracity of the findings themselves. All articles published on StudyFinds are vetted by our editors prior to publication and include links back to the source or corresponding journal article, if possible.

Our Editorial Team

Steve Fink


Chris Melore


Sophia Naughton

Associate Editor